Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register    
 
smk mk64 mksc mkdd mkds mkwii mk7 mk8
general   mafia   smk   mk64   mksc   mkdd   mkds   mkw   mk7   mk8   |   problems   |   discord   irc
 
  Home Search Members Login Register
 
Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
Rough Draft: Proposal to add New Rules (Read 341 times)
Vega
Legend
*****
Offline



ate 4952 donuts
In the Time Base of Broadway
Gender: male
Rough Draft: Proposal to add New Rules
11/01/18 at 08:53:58
 
First thing's first. This is for the MKWPP site only. Please do not post anything MKWRS.com related in this thread. MKWRS.com has its own specific thread.

With the discussion over Suiryu's WR recently, it reminded me that we have quite a bit of stuff missing for the overall Rules/Regs for the MKWPP.

Let's get right to it.... What I propose -

1. Any Site Records (including Flaps) made by a player without a Green Checkmark on their profile must have at least one of following proofs:

- Link to ghost on CTGP website
- Link to a recorded stream, following the Stream Protocol

NOTE: When a time updater adds a New Site Record (on a profile w/o a Green Checkmark), he/she must publicly post so on the time updating thread along with the proof required. If a New Site Record is added without the provided proof (such as a random person having the parser password and adding Site Records out of nowhere), time updaters must remove the time and post so on the time updating thread.

2. This new rule will have a Grandfather Date of Oct 28, 2018. Any Site Records made after that date will be under this new Rule. (This will make Suiryus 2;20.4xx not be allowed on the MKWPP)

With this new rule, this will automatically ban ISO use for Site Records only. Stream Protocol can only be done with the official Disc and we know CTGP is official disc only. However, general ISO use is still allowed.

Back to top
 
« Last Edit: 11/15/18 at 07:33:47 by Vega »  

My Website - http://mkwii.com/
View Profile WWW   IP Logged
WL95★Jaxon
Elite
***
Offline

I like pancakes... a
lot

Said hello to 2568 people of YouTube
USA
Gender: male
Re: Rough Draft: Purposal to add New Rules
Reply #1 - 11/01/18 at 09:01:41
 
I am 100% in support of this addition. It adds benefits without removing from the already existing ruleset.
Back to top
 
 

Former MKW Player

YouTube Channel

Rhodechill wrote on 02/16/18 at 09:53:50:
how do you get WR but bypass the top tens

Arvo57 wrote on 02/10/19 at 11:35:14:
PP can do whatever the fuck they want, I and nobody else can really change that

JawsTheShark wrote on 02/26/19 at 22:18:26:
Your sneak disses are desperate and weak!
View Profile   IP Logged
RosscoXz
King
****
Offline

I Love Mark 2.0!

hit 4905 moles

Re: Rough Draft: Purposal to add New Rules
Reply #2 - 11/01/18 at 09:33:56
 
I agree about the last part, I feel like we as a community are slowly headed towards ‘ctgp only’ and, although ideal, it isn’t plausible imo
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
ZedR
King
****
Offline

EPK

3575 days karting
Germany
Gender: male
Re: Rough Draft: Purposal to add New Rules
Reply #3 - 11/01/18 at 15:01:33
 
"I don't think having a 'CTGP only' rule is logically sound. This will force TTers that they have to hack their Wii to play legit. That's counter intuitive. I also think forcing a Green checkmarked player to have his Site Record ghost available on CTGP or recorded on live stream only, can also throw us into a pile of shit."

1. Not Updating a game that does not change it but makes it better for a legit competitive reason is not a reason for me to not get CTGP. You dont even really hack your wii, you just install a "game" with a SD card. There is nothing bad about it. These could be legit Nintendo Updates but Nintendo did not care.

2. Current checkmarks are nonsense. We should completely remove the checkmarks.

3. A green checkmark does not mean you are free from accusations. Whoever you are - get your time on ctgp or stream. Just uploading a time without any proof that this time exists or was driven humanly is a reason for me to put this time into a pending times section until a ghost or streamlink is aviable. Its 2018 and our TT Past is unfortunately not that good.
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
WL95★Jaxon
Elite
***
Offline

I like pancakes... a
lot

Said hello to 2568 people of YouTube
USA
Gender: male
Re: Rough Draft: Purposal to add New Rules
Reply #4 - 11/01/18 at 16:47:37
 
ZedR wrote on 11/01/18 at 15:01:33:
Not Updating a game that does not change it but makes it better for a legit competitive reason is not a reason for me to not get CTGP.

I heavily disagree with this. If people want a "CTGP Only Leaderboard" it already exists. CTGP isn't an update, it's a mod and downloading a mod to play legit is like Zak said, ironically counterintuitive.

I'm not shitting on CTGP. It's a great software that has done a lot for the competitive scene BUT should not be the only method to having a time counted.
Back to top
 
 

Former MKW Player

YouTube Channel

Rhodechill wrote on 02/16/18 at 09:53:50:
how do you get WR but bypass the top tens

Arvo57 wrote on 02/10/19 at 11:35:14:
PP can do whatever the fuck they want, I and nobody else can really change that

JawsTheShark wrote on 02/26/19 at 22:18:26:
Your sneak disses are desperate and weak!
View Profile   IP Logged
ZedR
King
****
Offline

EPK

missed 3575 mts
Germany
Gender: male
Re: Rough Draft: Purposal to add New Rules
Reply #5 - 11/01/18 at 17:07:15
 
WL95★Jaxon wrote on 11/01/18 at 16:47:37:
ZedR wrote on 11/01/18 at 15:01:33:
Not Updating a game that does not change it but makes it better for a legit competitive reason is not a reason for me to not get CTGP.

I heavily disagree with this. If people want a "CTGP Only Leaderboard" it already exists. CTGP isn't an update, it's a mod and downloading a mod to play legit is like Zak said, ironically counterintuitive.

I'm not shitting on CTGP. It's a great software that has done a lot for the competitive scene BUT should not be the only method to having a time counted.


You don't get my point. There could be any software or mod. The Time Trials are the same, the game stays the same and the records are the same. CTGP just checks if your time has legit inputs and if cheats were used. Its Vanilla TT all the way with add-ons for the ghost system.

That's why it exists.

CTGP only is not exactly what I want. I don't want times on tops/mkwrs that are suspicious and not certainly legit. Stream or ghost files are enough. I still don't have anything against CTGP only rule set. 95% of the current players use it anyways.

Also these people downloaded CTGP on purpose and probably say: "Almost everyone has CTGP so why should we take those who don't use it but post times and WRs into account?"
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
Bryce729
Karter
**
Offline



missed 2499 mts
USA
Gender: male
Re: Rough Draft: Purposal to add New Rules
Reply #6 - 11/01/18 at 20:26:01
 
For players that don't want to use ctgp, I feel like them streaming (or sending the ghost file, but I don't know how fool proof that is) should get the green checkmark too
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
Vega
Legend
*****
Offline



ate 4952 donuts
In the Time Base of Broadway
Gender: male
Re: Rough Draft: Purposal to add New Rules
Reply #7 - 11/02/18 at 06:07:27
 
@Bryce There's an official (100% hack proof) stream protocol guide in this thread - http://www.mariokart64.com/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1431108141 Currently there are multiple ways to get Green checkmark status but its kind of outdated so this leads me to my next point in regards to responding to ZedR...

@ZedR Good point on the current Checkmark system. We could trash the whole thing and start from fresh. That may be the best option. Sometimes things just need an overhaul. Can you give me a rough draft of your what you think the new checkmark system could be? Thanks. In regards to CTGP...

Do you need HBC (or any other hacked/exploited third-party software) installed on your Wii to run CTGP? Yes or No. If it's Yes, then once again that doesn't make any sense to force people to hack their Wii to play legit.

Back to top
 
 

My Website - http://mkwii.com/
View Profile WWW   IP Logged
ZedR
King
****
Offline

EPK

fell 3575 times for marty
Germany
Gender: male
Re: Rough Draft: Purposal to add New Rules
Reply #8 - 11/02/18 at 07:49:04
 
Vega wrote on 11/02/18 at 06:07:27:
@Bryce There's an official (100% hack proof) stream protocol guide in this thread - http://www.mariokart64.com/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1431108141 Currently there are multiple ways to get Green checkmark status but its kind of outdated so this leads me to my next point in regards to responding to ZedR...

@ZedR Good point on the current Checkmark system. We could trash the whole thing and start from fresh. That may be the best option. Sometimes things just need an overhaul. Can you give me a rough draft of your what you think the new checkmark system could be? Thanks. In regards to CTGP...

Do you need HBC (or any other hacked/exploited third-party software) installed on your Wii to run CTGP? Yes or No. If it's Yes, then once again that doesn't make any sense to force people to hack their Wii to play legit.




I would not use checkmarks to indicate the legitimacy of a single player. Theoretically, someone with a green checkmark can upload a fake run on youtube and submit it. I also don't wanna know how many fake submissions are on the PP.

Why not focus on the single times instead? Every players has to link the CTGP profile (if they use it) Updater can just check if the time exists in the first place.

How can you say suiryu's run for example is driven legit or even driven by suiryu himself? There is just a video on youtube and we all know that's not enough proof for a single time.

Maybe you can replace the checkmarks with links to the CTGP profile in order to show that this player currently uses CTGP for his PBs and other people can see it.

people who do not use CTGP are at a disadvantage in the first place. But there are ways to prove that the time "exists".

And no you need HBC in order to install CTGP. But I just can't see the problem. You hack your Wii because you need a third party software for the ghostsystem. You dont hack your wii to play legit. You hack your wii to actually prove your times are real. Something Nintendo should have done before but MrBean created it for us.
Back to top
 
« Last Edit: 11/02/18 at 08:05:13 by ZedR »  
View Profile   IP Logged
WL95★Jaxon
Elite
***
Offline

I like pancakes... a
lot

Said hello to 2568 people of YouTube
USA
Gender: male
Re: Rough Draft: Purposal to add New Rules
Reply #9 - 11/02/18 at 08:34:39
 
Quote:
You dont hack your wii to play legit. You hack your wii to actually prove your times are real.

You don't pay internet bills to use the internet. You pay internet bills to having a working router
Back to top
 
 

Former MKW Player

YouTube Channel

Rhodechill wrote on 02/16/18 at 09:53:50:
how do you get WR but bypass the top tens

Arvo57 wrote on 02/10/19 at 11:35:14:
PP can do whatever the fuck they want, I and nobody else can really change that

JawsTheShark wrote on 02/26/19 at 22:18:26:
Your sneak disses are desperate and weak!
View Profile   IP Logged
ZedR
King
****
Offline

EPK

missed 3575 mts
Germany
Gender: male
Re: Rough Draft: Purposal to add New Rules
Reply #10 - 11/02/18 at 10:06:38
 
WL95★Jaxon wrote on 11/02/18 at 08:34:39:
Quote:
You dont hack your wii to play legit. You hack your wii to actually prove your times are real.

You don't pay internet bills to use the internet. You pay internet bills to having a working router


And what the living hell has this to do with ctgp
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
Sosis
Elite
***
Offline

Better than the
CPUs!

3253 days karting

Gender: male
Re: Rough Draft: Purposal to add New Rules
Reply #11 - 11/02/18 at 10:34:48
 
ZedR wrote on 11/02/18 at 10:06:38:
WL95★Jaxon wrote on 11/02/18 at 08:34:39:
Quote:
You dont hack your wii to play legit. You hack your wii to actually prove your times are real.

You don't pay internet bills to use the internet. You pay internet bills to having a working router


And what the living hell has this to do with ctgp


It’s an analogy, but in my opinion refusing to get ctgp since you don’t want to hack your Wii/Wii U shouldn’t be an excuse considering there’s very little risk (if any) in installing HBC and CTGP based on personal experience. Plus the way this is heading, ctgp may become a requirement for WRs (neutral on this tho), so refusing gives me the idea that someone must be hiding something regardless of history/progress...
Back to top
 
 
View Profile WWW sosiss23   IP Logged
ZedR
King
****
Offline

EPK

missed 3575 mts
Germany
Gender: male
Re: Rough Draft: Purposal to add New Rules
Reply #12 - 11/02/18 at 12:46:04
 
Sosis wrote on 11/02/18 at 10:34:48:
ZedR wrote on 11/02/18 at 10:06:38:
WL95★Jaxon wrote on 11/02/18 at 08:34:39:
Quote:
You dont hack your wii to play legit. You hack your wii to actually prove your times are real.

You don't pay internet bills to use the internet. You pay internet bills to having a working router


And what the living hell has this to do with ctgp


It’s an analogy, but in my opinion refusing to get ctgp since you don’t want to hack your Wii/Wii U shouldn’t be an excuse considering there’s very little risk (if any) in installing HBC and CTGP based on personal experience. Plus the way this is heading, ctgp may become a requirement for WRs (neutral on this tho), so refusing gives me the idea that someone must be hiding something regardless of history/progress...


there is not risk. As long as you follow the instructions.
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
WL95★Jaxon
Elite
***
Offline

I like pancakes... a
lot

Said hello to 2568 people of YouTube
USA
Gender: male
Re: Rough Draft: Purposal to add New Rules
Reply #13 - 11/02/18 at 13:08:13
 
Sosis wrote on 11/02/18 at 10:34:48:
ZedR wrote on 11/02/18 at 10:06:38:
WL95★Jaxon wrote on 11/02/18 at 08:34:39:
Quote:
You dont hack your wii to play legit. You hack your wii to actually prove your times are real.

You don't pay internet bills to use the internet. You pay internet bills to having a working router


And what the living hell has this to do with ctgp


It’s an analogy, but in my opinion refusing to get ctgp since you don’t want to hack your Wii/Wii U shouldn’t be an excuse considering there’s very little risk (if any) in installing HBC and CTGP based on personal experience. Plus the way this is heading, ctgp may become a requirement for WRs (neutral on this tho), so refusing gives me the idea that someone must be hiding something regardless of history/progress...

Not sure if you are implying that I cheat but if you are then Smiley
I've got nothing to hide, I just play a video game for fun in my spare time
Back to top
 
 

Former MKW Player

YouTube Channel

Rhodechill wrote on 02/16/18 at 09:53:50:
how do you get WR but bypass the top tens

Arvo57 wrote on 02/10/19 at 11:35:14:
PP can do whatever the fuck they want, I and nobody else can really change that

JawsTheShark wrote on 02/26/19 at 22:18:26:
Your sneak disses are desperate and weak!
View Profile   IP Logged
ZedR
King
****
Offline

EPK

3575 days karting
Germany
Gender: male
Re: Rough Draft: Purposal to add New Rules
Reply #14 - 11/02/18 at 20:28:12
 
WL95★Jaxon wrote on 11/02/18 at 13:08:13:
Sosis wrote on 11/02/18 at 10:34:48:
ZedR wrote on 11/02/18 at 10:06:38:
WL95★Jaxon wrote on 11/02/18 at 08:34:39:
Quote:
You dont hack your wii to play legit. You hack your wii to actually prove your times are real.

You don't pay internet bills to use the internet. You pay internet bills to having a working router


And what the living hell has this to do with ctgp


It’s an analogy, but in my opinion refusing to get ctgp since you don’t want to hack your Wii/Wii U shouldn’t be an excuse considering there’s very little risk (if any) in installing HBC and CTGP based on personal experience. Plus the way this is heading, ctgp may become a requirement for WRs (neutral on this tho), so refusing gives me the idea that someone must be hiding something regardless of history/progress...

Not sure if you are implying that I cheat but if you are then Smiley
I've got nothing to hide, I just play a video game for fun in my spare time



Have fun playing this game casually and do what you want.  But when you want times updated you should either get CTGP or at least stream the session  Wink

Have fun, discussion closed.
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
Vega
Legend
*****
Offline



4952 holabolas
In the Time Base of Broadway
Gender: male
Re: Rough Draft: Purposal to add New Rules
Reply #15 - 11/03/18 at 06:07:21
 
ZedR wrote on 11/02/18 at 07:49:04:
Vega wrote on 11/02/18 at 06:07:27:
@Bryce There's an official (100% hack proof) stream protocol guide in this thread - http://www.mariokart64.com/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1431108141 Currently there are multiple ways to get Green checkmark status but its kind of outdated so this leads me to my next point in regards to responding to ZedR...

@ZedR Good point on the current Checkmark system. We could trash the whole thing and start from fresh. That may be the best option. Sometimes things just need an overhaul. Can you give me a rough draft of your what you think the new checkmark system could be? Thanks. In regards to CTGP...

Do you need HBC (or any other hacked/exploited third-party software) installed on your Wii to run CTGP? Yes or No. If it's Yes, then once again that doesn't make any sense to force people to hack their Wii to play legit.




I would not use checkmarks to indicate the legitimacy of a single player. Theoretically, someone with a green checkmark can upload a fake run on youtube and submit it. I also don't wanna know how many fake submissions are on the PP.

Why not focus on the single times instead? Every players has to link the CTGP profile (if they use it) Updater can just check if the time exists in the first place.

How can you say suiryu's run for example is driven legit or even driven by suiryu himself? There is just a video on youtube and we all know that's not enough proof for a single time.

Maybe you can replace the checkmarks with links to the CTGP profile in order to show that this player currently uses CTGP for his PBs and other people can see it.

people who do not use CTGP are at a disadvantage in the first place. But there are ways to prove that the time "exists".

And no you need HBC in order to install CTGP. But I just can't see the problem. You hack your Wii because you need a third party software for the ghostsystem. You dont hack your wii to play legit. You hack your wii to actually prove your times are real. Something Nintendo should have done before but MrBean created it for us.


1. In regard to your example of a person manipulating the checkmark status: We could just make the system more strict. How about a rule where ALL site records must be on CTGP or a reviewable link of a live stream (following protocol) regardless of the checkmark status.

The 75% thing I eluded to earlier wouldn't show a player is cheater proof but a very likely legit player. You could however do the 75% thing for the yellow checkmark, and only allow players to have green checkmarks is EVERY time is done on CTGP/reviewable live stream. We could do some sort of record keeping for the list of players with green checkmarks along with certain data of their PRs. But this would be futile with the rule I stated in the previous paragraph.

2. In regards to your Suiryu video comment: Yes I agree, that's why everyone is having this conversation. The Japanese are well aware they have gotten free-bies in the pass. With Suiryu's run, I'm glad the community has now started to get a conversation started so a problem like this will less likely occur in the future (hopefully never again). With a new ruleset, if someone did what Suiryu did, there would be no controversy. We simply don't count it. Everyone is happy.

3. "You don't hack your wii to play legit": I was assuming you would know exactly what I meant when I made the statement in my previous post- "force people to hack their Wii to play legit.". I'm not literally saying you need to Hack your Wii in order to be a legitimate TTer. I'm saying you are forcing people to actually install non-Nintendo software as the only way to be accepted. In my honest opinion, that is ludicrous.

------------------------

@Sosis the amount of 'risk' is irrelevant. No other Player's Page requires their players to hack their gaming console. It's simply silly. I can understand something such as... only allow Players to have green checkmarks if every time they have is on CTGP. That way, instead of forcing people to hack their Wiis, you incline them to do so on their own will.

Back to top
 
 

My Website - http://mkwii.com/
View Profile WWW   IP Logged
Colvin
Ex Member




Re: Rough Draft: Purposal to add New Rules
Reply #16 - 11/04/18 at 15:14:15
 
ZedR wrote on 11/01/18 at 15:01:33:
1. Not Updating a game that does not change it but makes it better for a legit competitive reason is not a reason for me to not get CTGP. You dont even really hack your wii, you just install a "game" with a SD card. There is nothing bad about it. These could be legit Nintendo Updates but Nintendo did not care.

2. Current checkmarks are nonsense. We should completely remove the checkmarks.

3. A green checkmark does not mean you are free from accusations. Whoever you are - get your time on ctgp or stream. Just uploading a time without any proof that this time exists or was driven humanly is a reason for me to put this time into a pending times section until a ghost or streamlink is aviable. Its 2018 and our TT Past is unfortunately not that good.

^ why didnt this end discussion? Every point here is perfect.
Back to top
 
 
  IP Logged
RosscoXz
King
****
Offline

I Love Mark 2.0!

fell 4905 times for marty

Re: Rough Draft: Purposal to add New Rules
Reply #17 - 11/04/18 at 16:02:04
 
DennisColvin76 wrote on 11/04/18 at 15:14:15:
ZedR wrote on 11/01/18 at 15:01:33:
1. Not Updating a game that does not change it but makes it better for a legit competitive reason is not a reason for me to not get CTGP. You dont even really hack your wii, you just install a "game" with a SD card. There is nothing bad about it. These could be legit Nintendo Updates but Nintendo did not care.

2. Current checkmarks are nonsense. We should completely remove the checkmarks.

3. A green checkmark does not mean you are free from accusations. Whoever you are - get your time on ctgp or stream. Just uploading a time without any proof that this time exists or was driven humanly is a reason for me to put this time into a pending times section until a ghost or streamlink is aviable. Its 2018 and our TT Past is unfortunately not that good.

^ why didnt this end discussion? Every point here is perfect.

Well there wouldn’t be a discussion if everyone agreed in the first place would there
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
Vega
Legend
*****
Offline



helped 4952 people
In the Time Base of Broadway
Gender: male
Re: Rough Draft: Purposal to add New Rules
Reply #18 - 11/06/18 at 05:06:18
 
DennisColvin76 wrote on 11/04/18 at 15:14:15:
ZedR wrote on 11/01/18 at 15:01:33:
1. Not Updating a game that does not change it but makes it better for a legit competitive reason is not a reason for me to not get CTGP. You dont even really hack your wii, you just install a "game" with a SD card. There is nothing bad about it. These could be legit Nintendo Updates but Nintendo did not care.

2. Current checkmarks are nonsense. We should completely remove the checkmarks.

3. A green checkmark does not mean you are free from accusations. Whoever you are - get your time on ctgp or stream. Just uploading a time without any proof that this time exists or was driven humanly is a reason for me to put this time into a pending times section until a ghost or streamlink is aviable. Its 2018 and our TT Past is unfortunately not that good.

^ why didnt this end discussion? Every point here is perfect.


Your 'perfect' could be different than someone else's perfect. That term is completely subjective.
Back to top
 
 

My Website - http://mkwii.com/
View Profile WWW   IP Logged
Vega
Legend
*****
Offline



4952 days karting
In the Time Base of Broadway
Gender: male
Re: Rough Draft: Purposal to add New Rules
Reply #19 - 11/06/18 at 06:03:10
 
Updated my Original Post with a simplifed new Rule.  Please review the OP.

Some good arguments I can see against my idea is:

- ISOs should now be banned entirely since the new Site Record rule will auto ban ISO use by nature (for Site Record times only)

- Scrap the checkmark system and make a new one******

******This would require overhauling the entire system/ruleset of the MKWPP. Which quite frankly cannot be done with the way this community runs itself.
Back to top
 
 

My Website - http://mkwii.com/
View Profile WWW   IP Logged
MKchouy93
Elite
***
Offline

I Love Mark 2.0!

fell 4964 times for marty

Re: Rough Draft: Purposal to add New Rules
Reply #20 - 11/06/18 at 10:50:46
 
Vega wrote on 11/06/18 at 06:03:10:
Updated my Original Post with a simplifed new Rule.  Please review the OP.

Some good arguments I can see against my idea is:

- ISOs should now be banned entirely since the new Site Record rule will auto ban ISO use by nature (for Site Record times only)

- Scrap the checkmark system and make a new one******

******This would require overhauling the entire system/ruleset of the MKWPP. Which quite frankly cannot be done with the way this community runs itself.


I like this^

Zak-> "1. In regard to your example of a person manipulating the checkmark status: We could just make the system more strict. How about a rule where ALL site records must be on CTGP or a reviewable link of a live stream (following protocol) regardless of the checkmark status"

I like this too.  Just make it for SR or WRs that need to be done on CTGP or stream protocol.  The average player doesn't have to bother with this when submitting times.  Only issue I see with this is the Japanese players who don't use CTGP very likely will not live stream either lol.
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
Pages: 1
Send Topic Print