ZedR wrote on 11/02/18 at 07:49:04:Vega wrote on 11/02/18 at 06:07:27:@Bryce There's an official (100% hack proof) stream protocol guide in this thread -
http://www.mariokart64.com/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1431108141 Currently there are multiple ways to get Green checkmark status but its kind of outdated so this leads me to my next point in regards to responding to ZedR...
@ZedR Good point on the current Checkmark system. We could trash the whole thing and start from fresh. That may be the best option. Sometimes things just need an overhaul. Can you give me a rough draft of your what you think the new checkmark system could be? Thanks. In regards to CTGP...
Do you need HBC (or any other hacked/exploited third-party software) installed on your Wii to run CTGP? Yes or No. If it's Yes, then once again that doesn't make any sense to force people to hack their Wii to play legit.
I would not use checkmarks to indicate the legitimacy of a single player. Theoretically, someone with a green checkmark can upload a fake run on youtube and submit it. I also don't wanna know how many fake submissions are on the PP.
Why not focus on the single times instead? Every players has to link the CTGP profile (if they use it) Updater can just check if the time exists in the first place.
How can you say suiryu's run for example is driven legit or even driven by suiryu himself? There is just a video on youtube and we all know that's not enough proof for a single time.
Maybe you can replace the checkmarks with links to the CTGP profile in order to show that this player currently uses CTGP for his PBs and other people can see it.
people who do not use CTGP are at a disadvantage in the first place. But there are ways to prove that the time "exists".
And no you need HBC in order to install CTGP. But I just can't see the problem. You hack your Wii because you need a third party software for the ghostsystem. You dont hack your wii to play legit. You hack your wii to actually prove your times are real. Something Nintendo should have done before but MrBean created it for us.
1. In regard to your example of a person manipulating the checkmark status: We could just make the system more strict. How about a rule where ALL site records must be on CTGP or a reviewable link of a live stream (following protocol) regardless of the checkmark status.
The 75% thing I eluded to earlier wouldn't show a player is cheater proof but a very likely legit player. You could however do the 75% thing for the yellow checkmark, and only allow players to have green checkmarks is EVERY time is done on CTGP/reviewable live stream. We could do some sort of record keeping for the list of players with green checkmarks along with certain data of their PRs. But this would be futile with the rule I stated in the previous paragraph.
2. In regards to your Suiryu video comment: Yes I agree, that's why everyone is having this conversation. The Japanese are well aware they have gotten free-bies in the pass. With Suiryu's run, I'm glad the community has now started to get a conversation started so a problem like this will less likely occur in the future (hopefully never again). With a new ruleset, if someone did what Suiryu did, there would be no controversy. We simply don't count it. Everyone is happy.
3. "You don't hack your wii to play legit": I was assuming you would know exactly what I meant when I made the statement in my previous post- "force people to hack their Wii to play legit.". I'm not literally saying you need to Hack your Wii in order to be a legitimate TTer. I'm saying you are forcing people to actually install non-Nintendo software as the only way to be accepted. In my honest opinion, that is ludicrous.
------------------------
@Sosis the amount of 'risk' is irrelevant. No other Player's Page requires their players to hack their gaming console. It's simply silly. I can understand something such as... only allow Players to have green checkmarks if every time they have is on CTGP. That way, instead of forcing people to hack their Wiis, you incline them to do so on their own will.