Hey, sooooo I'm gonna start with Harambey since he's looked the scummiest all game to me regardless of his experience.....
I didn't like how he jumped on Alak by voting him immediately... I mean sure I'm fine with it if he's someone who wants to play this with an aggressive playstyle but really his playstyle has been all over the place. He's been active but I feel like he's been more passive than aggressive this game and in general i feel like an inconsistent playstyle could be a scummy thing. Maybe I'm going tooooo deep into that idk tho.
"Well, if Alaktorn has some kind of masterplan and he's a Townie, whatever his masterplan is it's most likely going to fail
"
Don't like this post at all. He later says he has no idea what Alak's masterplan would be and just saying it's gonna fail with a smiley face makes me feel like he's optimistic about the idea of town failing.
Just a quick thing about Alak here. Almost everyone has posted now, so I just wanna say that I think he did it as a bait to see people's reactions to it and maybe his idea was he could get reads from that?
@alak can you confirm? Just a thought... back to harambey
"I'm not in favor of Day 1 lynches because we don't really have info. The only information we have comes from others' comments, but there's no way to read in that. I want to see some 'actual facts' first
(as in: night actions and stuff, or, if there's a lynch, who voted for the lynched player)And I wanted to hear more about what Alak had to say, but he just picks other topics to talk about. Which is kind of sus to me, but I also don't want to get locked in a tunnel vision.
If I'm going to lynch someone on Day 1, then it's gonna be an inactive player. Otherwise I'm just not gonna vote right now."
I haaaaaaaaaaate this post. The majority of the information in this game comes from other's comments and lynching the most inactive player means we're lynching the player we have the least information on.
"Alaktorn, am I obliged to answer to your questions? By the way, I already removed my vote. I'm not gonna let myself get 'controlled' during the day."
Everyone should answer every question they're asked in the game so we can get as much information as possible I really don't like the dodging here.
"But you're creating so much theories so early in game, I really don't think it favors Town."
Apparently theory crafting doesn't favour town...........
"Also, why are you being so aggressive?"
Don't like this either, aggression is a very good way to get information and it looks like he's starting to feel the pressure here. It's hard to know if him feeling pressure here is more scummy or towny.... maybe some more experienced players could read it better?
"I'm gonna wait a while until I see more people become active, because right now the six of us are just accusing each other...... No more opinions from me on anything or anyone from you. I'll just see what the other players have to say and with which ones I agree or disagree"
So apparently activity is baaaaaaad? Like there's a good chance that there's mafia within those 6 players lol
"So I'm not going to lynch, and from my point of vision it's also better from Town. But if you have reasons for why it would be better to lynch someone at this point, go on, lynch someone."
He's just not trying to scumhunt at all it feels like. Like not lynching town just cuz there's a more than 50% chance town will die. That's only greater than 50% with no information.... I think the first maf game I played here I was maf with Dan and dan also advocated for no lynch there. Sooooo idk if this no lynch thing is a town or maf thing.
In response to who he thinks is the scummiest:
"I'm not gonna answer to that question. If I say it's Alak, that'll guaranteed make him shout at me again and accuse me of several things based on questionable reasons, while also coming up with new theories. If I say it's someone else pretty much the same stuff will happen.
I don't want to make anyone suspicious, nor say things that will most likely cause others to make players suspicious.
Feel free to ask me more questions but I won't respond to them."
Likeeee this is pretttyyyyy scummy right? Is it still possible to be n00b town? Kindaaaaaaa tough to know
So he seems like guaranteed maf buuuuuuut
"The reason I was quiet was because, to me, it felt like it was going personal, and I know it isn't cuz heck it's just a game, but it still does feel like it. I've spoken to Dans about this too, but he managed to persuade me not to quit, so now I'm just going to play on and see what happens"
This one throws me off a bit. So obviously the pressure got to him to the point where he wanted to quit. What do we make of that? Like I have no idea if that's a twon or maf thing someone please enlighten me lol
And then the PAF callout I liked cuz it fit with his idea of wanting to lynch someone active and he had a reason for it so he had consistency which is good I think.
Soooooooooooooooo basically he's made the scummiest posts but I have like no actual idea what his alignment is. I wanna hear some thoughts about his PAF vote as well as if the pressure getting to him is indicative of alignment or not pls and ty.
Also I'm just really tired... so I'm not gonna analyze other players for now and I'm just gonna post my reads quick if that's cool.
Pages: 
