I think I see a pattern in people's accusations on me, from all the games I've played. Seems they want me to be one-sided. Sorry but that just isn't my style. Most of the times I explicit my read on people and which arguments are stronger, but I still feel like poiting out counter-arguments so I take everything into consideration and allow myself (and everyone else) to change my mind later on.
It gets pretty absurd when people claim that my counter-arguments make my entire reasoning useless. FFS, I still give town ideas and I still know which side to follow, for the current moment at least.
Also, like I said, I did the same in both games in which I was town, and in both I got wagoned for this. Are you willing to do the same mistake?
Also, it worked last game, so give me a chance.

With this in mind, I think scum would like to go thru this lame logic about my playstyle. My wagon probably isn't 100% town. I can say Thiradell is sort of excused bc he probably didn't read the past games. I don't like how Zoran and TvK ignore that I'm being myself even though they both read both previous games... can't conclude much, but I'll be damned if all 3 are town.

As for Dan.... he actually looks better by trying to get into my perspetive, would it be a good move for him as scum? And he does make a point about his defense, it does remind me of D1 of my first game. I'll keep my vote on him for now since pretty much noone triggers my scum radar.
There may be a chance he's pocketing me, but that's unlikely (Oh look, a counter-argument!! Forget everything he said and just lynch him already!!! )

To answer Leone's question on replay #330, I guess if Dan/you were town TvK would be the most likely scum.