TvK wrote on 04/19/17 at 03:12:59:The worst thing about the entire discussion on page 3 is that we have filled an entire page without doing any kind of scumhunting. The people I have my eye on at this point are Diamond and PAF. Diamond's only contributions so far are his vote on Dan and his two cents in the discussion about odds. As for PAF? I don't like the ay he tried to justify his reasoning behind unvoting Dan. He was perfectly fine with staying on Dan when there were no other votes on him, but once there were three votes on Dan, PAF tried to look for a good reason to unvote Dan. And then all of a sudden, it looked like PAF finally remembered that there was an angel role in the game and that that would be a legit reason to move his vote away from Dan. Not to mention that once Dan did have 3 votes on him, that's when PAF decided to say that his first vote indeed was random.
I'll start here:
[vote]PAF[/vote]
Here we go again. You're looking at my posts assuming I'm wolf for no reason and making me look suspect as much as you can even though what I did was perfectly natural for a townie. Sounds familiar...

Ah who am I kidding. You could do this as town. But I don't want to let you get off so easily.....
I did forget about the angel when I made my first posts (before 10PM GMT). I thought of the idea while offline and it seemed to fit.
This role shouldn't be ignored. One of us WANTS to be lynched, and if we do like they want, it's GAME OVER on D1.
The angel would stick out more than anyone IMO. Dan insisted on his frustration way too much. Besides, none else acted anywhere near angel-like.
Dan's reply to my post didn't satisfy me. I like how he focused on other people and read IsaaK as scum later on (not saying I agree with him...), but maybe he could've realized he was risking too much?
I really don't see anyone else being angel, with the exception of Timur, but I'll give him some time.