I'm going to catch up on everything I missed. I'll reply to posts as I go, so I might unintentionally repeat what others have already said.
DansGame wrote on 01/08/17 at 07:42:00:This is a high power game with a lot of night action potential for affecting the game. I've been thinking about it, but I wonder what other people think: how do people feel about the idea of discussing what night actions should be before they happen?
Lets break it down by role:
Scanner- this one could work, but the scanners need to be anonymous. If maf know who will be scanning, they can stop it from happening. The tough part is making sure a scan isn't wasted by two people scanning the same target, but I can't think of a solution to avoid that without someone claiming scanner and telling others not to scan their target.
Heal- not gonna work. If maf know who will be healed, they'll just target someone else.
Roleblock- not gonna work. If someone knows they're gonna be blocked, they'll save their action for another night.
Shoot- not gonna work. If the agreed target is town, maf will let it happen. If the agreed target is maf, the shot could be blocked, re-directed, or the target could be healed. There's also the possibility that maf will redirect from a town and set up a mislynch.
Control- same as the roleblock, they'll just save their action.
(after typing all of this, I saw this post)...
DansGame wrote on 01/08/17 at 08:57:21:I definitely don't think we should discuss our specific night actions yet, but I want people to try to think of possible scenarios where discussing our night actions will benefit town regardless of whether mafia knows what we will do, if there are any.
Did I answer this question with my above comments? I don't think discussing roles other than the scan can benefit the town unless we're vague (ie, "heal someone who maf might target"), but that stuff should be common sense anyway.
Vinnie927 wrote on 01/08/17 at 08:51:38:The first vote didn't show up on Shock's page for some reason. What I said about conclusions was that I wouldn't change my vote until Zac comes back, but enough people are defending him that I'm starting to reconsider.
This looks like you're trying to preserve your own image. People aren't defending him, they just aren't giving him a maf lean like you want them to. Rather than reconsider, try putting together some actual evidence against him. Your response to other peoples' reads makes you look bad.