I tried to get Lenny to make an appearance yesterday, but he apparently didn't show up. I'll continue to talk to him about coming on here.
Web wrote on 01/08/17 at 06:15:59:The most interesting thing to me about the exchange is that Vinnie responded 20 seconds after your post questioning if there was an executioner, which shows both impressive reaction time and absolute confidence that the role wasn't in the game. His double post coming in at #53 and #54 also reads pretty defensive for someone who only had a slight accusation against him. Vinnie is my strongest scumread right now.
I was responding to something else (it was going to be memeing about the executioner), then I saw Dan's post in the Topic summary, so I responded to it. My double post was clarification, because I had felt that the first post wasn't clear enough.
Addressing the concern that many people are having about me: The only thing of substance I was online for was the conversation between Dan and 42. I had felt that the (admitedly limited) contributions I had made to the conversation sufficed, but they evidently didn't.
And now, my leans:
thewebinator: My strongest townlean so far, because his contributions are lining up with my suspicions. The fact that he isn't voting for me is only slightly relevant to my lean.
DansGame: His executioner strategy was on questionable foundation, as it depended on less-experienced players not reading the rules. As the majority of posts were based off of this flawed strategy, I feel as if I don't have enough to say about him.
42: The majority of his content has either been asking about the metagame, or accusing me. That seems like mafia to me, but it's not a lead that I plan on pursuing.
TvK: TvK has brought up several great points, and I'm inclined to believe he's town.
J-Cop: He's pretty much only made 6 posts, 3 of which were either joking or useless. Not much I can get from him as of right now.
theyounggun: Definitely the player with the least substance. My strongest maf lean up to this point, due to his seeming inability to progress when there's no one else on. The points that 42 and Dan applied to me are more applicable on tyg.
Zac: I just looked at Zac's posts. They're definitely just as, if not more suspicious than tyg's. I'll wait for them to post again before I say anything else about them.
Of course, the other four need to get on soon. Like I said, I'll try and get Lenny to get on here.
[vote]Zac[/vote]