Lafungo wrote on 05/17/16 at 17:04:07:I think it's far too easy to be critical of Brett's D1 play in retrospect, but with no information on D1, it was far safer than going after an inactive Walter. Regardless, I'm not going to continue the argument any further, as it's pointless now that all relevant parties are dead.
Did you read D1, or at least end of it? You again use the word retrospect. Are you implying that i'm critical of his game play only after he flipped?
I'm critical of Brett's play now and i was pretty much the only person who accused Brett on day 1. I was dead set on Walter, my one and only 100% maf so don't retrospect me here either.
It is not pointless to have this discussion and i will explain you why. Look at my 1st day 2 post. My post stands out, a nice bait to get the discussion going and potentially catch maf off guard. We all know there will be posts like: well done town person, i knew/suspected this guy was maf etc.
Look at who didn't see anything remotely suspicious in Brett (web) and who went straight for me (Timothy).
My views on this are:
1.Either you didn't read which makes me think you are scummy since maf is more busy with framing people then reading (i'm not implying they don't read it at all).
2. You read it and you really didn't see it
3. You just saw an opportunity to target someone and you went straight for it instead of at least trying to look at it for a moment.
Let me ask you a question, what are your views on timothy/sportsguy? And we know they should post more. maybe some other views.
And 1 more thing. Your "posting as you read". I personally don't like it, coming out of nowhere going straight for questions without reading is a bit scummy.
I will admit i have some weird ideas, but they do have a purpose. I gave you an example of my thinking on the Brett d2 thing.
Pages: 
