Also, I reread the entire thread to see if there are any leads to potential scumbuddies of Walter. These are the posts that particularly stood out for me:

☆ᓂ wrote on 05/15/16 at 12:43:59:


I'm not entirely sure here, but why the hell would you go and say this Zac? How would you now that Walter was lazy? Are you trying to divert the attention away from your scumbuddy?

No, I'm just confused as to why Sam F automatically became the top suspect

Can anybody answer my concerns about Eoj? After he slipped yesterday the reason we didn't wagon on him was to see if he could verify his lookout roleclaim tonight. Saying that he visited sportsguy and that he was the only person who visited means that no one can verify if they visited Sportsguy.

Can anybody answer my concerns about Eoj? After he slipped yesterday the reason we didn't wagon on him was to see if he could verify his lookout roleclaim tonight. Saying that he visited sportsguy and that he was the only person who visited means that no one can verify if they visited Sportsguy.

There's 4 possible outcomes with Joe at night.

1. They leave him alone, Joe watches someone and if need be can confirm himself by saying X visited Y. X can confirm/deny it if need be. It's possible that Joe and X could collude that as mafia but eventually it would backfire hard so probably wouldn't happen. If Joe claims X visited Y and X denies it, then there's your lynch.

2. They kill him, that's fine, he was a lynchable townie that now drew the night kill, a decent enough scenario given the circumstances.

3. They roleblock him, preventing him from watching someone to confirm himself. Also fine, draws the mafia roleblock.

4. They blackmail him, preventing him from easily outing info. We can still communicate by asking him to vote the person he watched and stuff. Not to mention, Joe being blackmailed wouldn't be the end of the world either.

All this is lost if we lynch him. His play so far with the riddles has been sporadic at best but I don't think it's alignment indicative. It's just bad play as either side. Again it's one thing if he claimed something unverifiable like bodyguard, but lookout is fully verifiable.

DansGame wrote on 05/17/16 at 11:39:05:

Well the fact they can't verify it, I stay with my current thoughts about him. Which is being suspicious, but not so sure about him being a mafia.

Zac what exactly made you change your mind on Eoj. I get that you couldn't get online before the day ended and that's fine, but something must have happened or been said to get you to change your stance on him

Furthermore by claiming to visit sportsguy, someone who at least in my mind seems unlikely to have had visitors, it's unlikely that someone else actually did visit sportsguy to counter Eoj's claim. I'm willing to change my vote but to me it seems like Eoj is mafia and did the only thing he could do to try and clear himself.

[vote]Eoj[/vote]

I'm willing to reconsider if someone has really solid evidence on someone else and can justify why Eoj might not be guilty here, I just don't buy it at all. I'll look at other people when I get home in 20-30 minutes (on my phone now)