Trust can never be fully regained once it's been betrayed. You insist that these players have changed, but do you really know that? No, you don't. You never can know for sure. The fact that these players have cheated before means that they have the potential to do it again if they're not kept in line, and in this case, the only way to do that is to watch them 24/7. That's not just a hardship for them; it's also a lot of extra work for us. Why should we jump through hoops to make it possible for the least deserving of all players to compete?
Another thing I'd like to point out is that there is also a punitive aspect to the punishment. Our WR history still records the legitimate times of players who later cheated, but the players themselves are barred from our site, and any awards they earned have been stripped away from them. The consequences mirror the crime: If you try to get the rewards without doing the work, then from now on, you will receive no rewards for whatever work you do put in. There really couldn't be a more fitting punishment.
Finally, let me remind you that our treatment of cheaters now has an influence on whether or not others will cheat in the future. If the consequences are severe, people will be more likely to think twice before cheating; there will always be a few who are foolish enough to try cheating anyway, but there will not be as many of them. However, if we make it known that we sometimes forgive cheating, people won't be nearly as afraid of getting caught. Why
wouldn't you try to cheat if getting caught just meant that you could take a few years off to practice and rejoin the community later once you'd honed your skills enough to get WR's legitimately?
yoshikecleon wrote on 05/01/15 at 08:57:11:I agree with this.
And I'm sure your agreement has nothing whatsoever to do with the fact that you'd like a second chance yourself, right?