Fant0m wrote on 03/18/14 at 12:41:02:


My apologies, Tim never did unvote me, you're right. But like I said, I tallied that up quick, and I really only did it because it hadn't been done yet. I even admitted it might be wrong. If you'd like, you can assume counting the votes, since you seem to have an eye for it.

As for voting for you, at least I substantiated that I wanted you to get more involved, unlike others who voted for you on the first day just because. I think that's how others felt though anyway regardless, hence why Brett unvoted for you now that you've finally posted. I hope you also realize that by the time you want to post tomorrow morning, the day will literally be almost over, so putting it off until then is basically saying you're not going to participate for the rest of day one, no? And nobody even tried to convince others to strictly vote toward you. People were voting toward dead weight players, and you happened to be one of them.

Me and Tim always used to vote for each other at the beginning of these games, so it was kind of tradition. This always happens at the beginning of mafia games, you should know this from playing in more than a few.

-~25 posts (too lazy to actually count) I am disapointed :/

Shock wrote on 03/18/14 at 08:07:38:

The explanation for my thoughts on why I think blahpy's town.
The basic principle lines on 2 things, one, the fact that blahpy is still somewhat new,
2) the fact that the banter was against me.
New players don't simply jump into banter as scum, they just don't. In addition, it was against me, and I'm known as a huge grudge player, and sacrificing one simple pawn to get me rolling, isn't a good idea.
The second part is mainly speculation, but I feel I have enough psychological basis to put the claim in. I don't like the bandwagon vote, but 9/10 my original anaylsis is correct, and I'm going to stick to that analysis.

Shock wrote on 03/18/14 at 08:07:38:


-you still see me as expendable though.
-note, preaching is a term that I'm familiar with, and using that to get what I'm trying to say out, (that what your doing is similar to preaching (so I feel)
(taken from the fank-english dictionary v5)

Shock, For some strange reason, I can't find the reasons to trust you. between flip flopping ideas and it "being personal", (especially flip flopping ideas concerning me.)

I have mixed thoughts about the silver vote, especially since you lead the charge, yes, it is screaming to be lynched, but I don't know if silver's flip does anything concerning your alignment? as you show that anyone is expendable in your eyes.


Sportsguy001 wrote on 03/18/14 at 08:04:09:

I feel like I've seen this stratergy from you as scum before... need to have a look back for confirmation.

J-Cop wrote on 03/18/14 at 06:37:35:

Still no substance from you J-cop, can you PLEASE, post something containing your opinion, instead of what looks like anyone would say.

Fant0m wrote on 03/18/14 at 12:41:02:

(shortened cause I don't want all the quote cause it's irrelevant and making my post closer to a novel)
Hi Flo, Don't worry, you still have 3 posts to convince me of what side you are on.

TvK wrote on 03/18/14 at 10:28:16:

Because, A Flo wagon (at that time) was as good as nearly any other wagon.

DJT wrote on 03/18/14 at 11:33:33:


Do you have a foot? because I'm not convinced you have one after this.

Robertvz wrote on 03/18/14 at 12:44:00:

Q, do you need to wait before it starts raining to do a rain dance?


Zwiebel, where the bloody hell are you...


A silver lynch looks good at the moment, a J-cop/sportsguy/zwiebel lynch I would bite at as well.

Fank009 wrote on 03/18/14 at 14:07:45:


Yes.

Also we're not getting someone that posts 0 times. If they genuinely aren't aware they are in the game than statistics say they are around 75% town and the modkill will just be used on them anyway, no need to waste the ML on Zwiebel.

Early impressions so far Shock or Kmacc is mafia.  Maybe both.

Quote:


Shock wrote on 03/17/14 at 23:18:09:


Wrote what I did thinking it very unlikely that someone would post any scummier than Silver has. So unless that changes, of course I will be arguing that lynching Silver is a good move to conclude D1. Heck, it even doesn't conflict with the argument of lynching a deadweight, as he hasn't really contributed anything at all.

I also want to hear more from Lafungo. Been rather quiet, followed up my attempt at getting something started/get the thread active with a repeat of what I wrote, even put a vote on Brett. Considering Brett isn't exactly striking me as townie, in retrospect wondering if this was softbussing, as there never was a real risk to Brett at that point.

Ah, Flo actually turned up.  Unvote.

I'm reading through page two & typing as I go along so bear with me as I may write something without having seen later responses.


@Silver - lay off the role claiming idea, it's easily possible to screw ourselves over early as it adds more confusion and is largely unnecessary - it's the kind of thing the maf will love to use to get in peoples heads. Idk if Flo was just busy or whether sitting back is actually part of his master plan but he's posted so whatever, that's good. One more thing, there is never "nothing" to go by. Are you actually hinting towards a no lynch? Even reading through these last posts, there is a lot more to go on than earlier even if it doesn't seem like much.

@Flo - Kmacc & I just have a history of voting for each other without reason, no idea why you think it's anymore noteworthy than the other "just because" votes. "Just because" votes stimulate discussion, even if you think it may serve no purpose so don't read too much into them. And you're right, I didn't unvote Kmacc but will do at the end of this post.

@Fank - I don't think Zweibel would be a good lynch at all, even if he hasn't posted he probably has a reason. Obviously I could be wrong but I would have though all maf would have posted by now. I'd much rather go after someone who has a higher possibility of being scum.

@Sportsguy - Pls expand on Shock/Kmacc?

Timothy wrote on 03/18/14 at 15:28:53:


Not exactly sure what you're saying here, do you think I went back to voting Flo? If you read the top of my last post, I unvoted for Flo. Like you said, more pressure could be applied to others right now, and I do think he's a useless townie at this point, hence why I took my vote off of him.

It's all good. Yeah I thought it was that way too, but Tom had it written out in rule #7 to use "Unvote: Name", so I was just following his rules. Everybody else seems to be just saying "unvote" though instead, so I guess I'll just start following that.

DJT wrote on 03/18/14 at 15:56:02:


It seems crazy still to ask for a role call though. The reason people had been voting for him (myself included) was because he had yet to post, and we wanted him to be active. Once he posted, people were willing to take their votes off of him, it seemed pretty clear that was all it took to "stop" the bandwagon.

Shock wrote on 03/18/14 at 13:52:11:


Well, chances are there's a doctor, and at least one of them would save Flo, even if it is himself.

I'm not new to Mafia, I'm relatively new to the way this forum plays it. Not used to knowing what goes on in your guys' minds.