I apologize that I wasn't around for a good portion of D1 since I've posted, sleep and school kind of take a good 14-16 hour chunk out of the way and I missed the main European shift of the game.
Apology accepted for now but make sure you keep up to date so you don't end up repeating what anyone else has said.No point in asking why Brett called me out as mafia either. His posting style is completely different from other games. Normally he posts out reasoning. Every single one of his posts seems blunt and pointless. Stating opinions as facts, and giving nothing. Reading through the day he's given loads of posts with the tone of "I'm right, you're wrong, that's it."
I wanted to know if there is anything outside of the game that may be provoking him to vote you in this way? And for you to place your first vote on him so early? Because to be quite honest it's bugged the living daylights out of me and I need to know why he's so confident that you're scum but he refuses to be of any help whatsoeverIf you mean a grudge or something personal that would cause him to vote me just because of that, I don't think so. I don't think his voting style has anything to do with outside events involving us. (That came out weird, you know what I mean 
) It's not a way to convince anyone and the only reason I could see him posting like this to his own advantage is if he's the fool or a role that wants to get lynched.
If he's the fool role then wouldn't you want people to not vote him? Since he wins the game if he is the Jester and he even stated himself the chances of a Jester are low. . . could be a huge double bluffThat's the only scenario I could come up with that explains his erratic posting style. I doubt it's the case, and that's why I'm still voting him. If I truly believed he was the jester I obviously wouldn't be voting him at this point.I'm done trying to read fank at this point. In my opinion he's fairly harmless if he's a mafia, and a dispensable mislynch if necessary on future days.
I don't thoroughly agree. I think he could be dangerous in the future because his posts are so jumbled up that it's hard to detect the true motive and emotion behind each one which is easy disguised as a town point of viewI guess I just haven't spent enough time trying to read his posts, which I can tune into D2, it's just hard to decipher them, but it's necessary to move the game forward.Vote: Brett
Just wondering, why didn't you vote him earlier? Considering he put his vote on you about 4 separate occasionsI wasn't here for that whole period of time, after I made my 3rd or so post, the first time I read the thread with those accusations was about an hour or so ago before making my post in response to you. I wasn't really sure what he was getting at when he just attacked me for no reason about 5 minutes from my first post, so I was kind of waiting to see what basis that was on or if it was just trying to get a response out of me right away. Playing really weird as opposed to previous games, and his style and tone of posts is just ignorant of other opinions. Why is he trying to find out where he slipped?
This is my opinion on the matter also. I haven't played with him in a while so I don't know if this is common play for him now but quite frankly he's not helping at allIf I had to take another stab at a vote, I would go for Tom, but I don't think he's said enough post-wise to really get a full analysis on, other than his excuse early. Sword is a weak town lean for contributing a lot of positive movement for the town.
Why would you vote for Tom? What's your reasoning behind that vote? Seems pretty random since all he's done this game is nail Clark (which is childish yet predicted) and pointed out Joe's edgy posting habits (which was a valid point). If you're still on about the excuse on Page 2 then I'm a little bit suspicious of you because I don't think that warrants holding much of a basis on 
Pages: 
