I'm in the process of creating an official proof requirements statement. I'll leave this discussion open until January 10th so anyone that wants to provide input can post, but I want input from you guys -- what do you expect in terms of proof requirements? What issues do you foresee regarding proof requirements? I have a very rough draft ready, but want to hear from you guys before posting it.

Please keep this discussion in this thread. Also, any Fenner-related posts in this thread will be deleted -- this discussion is for general handling of the site from here on out. If you want to use Fenner's case as an example, that's fine, but conversation directly about the Fenner decision will be gone. Use the Fenner Decision Thread for that.