A Runnelid
|
I actually never said a collective wanted him off the players' page on the basis of finding him annoying, but people have expressedly stated that they want his posting benefits removed from specific sections of the boards publicly here on the forums, which is saying something for the attitude people have towards him and how willing they are to flaunt that sentiment, all of which gives an idea of how much of this Terrence has to endure. (While, interestingly, nobody seems to find it out of place, given the (lack of) reaction from both those in charge of the forum moderation, and others part of the conversation.)
Terrence proves all of his times, many want him off the site bacause he may cheat and has on several occasions in the past. He's not a criminal putting others at risk, just putting that out there for a bit of perspective and reflection on magnitude and severity. The established proof system should be enough to keep him in check, otherwise those believing differently could have/would have voiced concerns about its inadequacies, perhaps in the spirit of constructivity suggesting other better methods for ensuring that cheating is avoided.
The streamed/video proof is the highest proof degree available within our community bar visiting someone to set streamed times. Apparently this is not to be trusted, at least not to the point that Terrence can remain on the site, even though most people trust his current time catalogue to be completely genuine. This is where I would see conflict in making generous room for his ability and potential to cheat. What is to be trusted apparently, is that he may, very much so, cheat and to prevent this best we can, it is best to not let him on the site at all, instead of relying on video evidence for every time and Terrence's spotless compliance towards our specially crafted guidelines. "I believe his timeset is well legitimate and he has very strict condictions and proof regulations to meet for acceptance, but because he may cheat, I want him off the site." </fictive quote> This, I don't agree with, and find slightly sad.
Andreas
|