On further review, it turns out that MVT's trolling and flames on this board has proved that a significant amount of people on this forum are mentally retarded, making them confuse a poll asking who they think is the least real person on this message board to "Who they hate the most". Of course these people must think that trolls on the internet are rare so that could be another reason for why they voted for him. Other things i need to say is that cutz should have been on there for being such a fucking bore that it is quite unbelievable.

I would like to thank the intelligent people of this MB who voted correctly with Harvey or retarded Flo, and i would like to thank MVT for pointing out that we have atleast 18 people on this message board that can't read. Here is your prize.



Thankyou.

"Trolling is the act of purposefully antagonizing other people on the internet, generally on message boards. When done in a moderated internet community, this can result in banning. When done to uptight people such as fundies, this can result in hilarity"

Source:

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=trolling


Does not necessarily mean they are not being real.

"That doesn't mean that they are being "real.""

I don't disagree with that, I just said it's not NECESSARILY the case, implying it could be either way.

I could quote many sources that say pretty much, but that was the first that wasn't wiki. Check for yourself if it matters that much.

Irony: you calling me a retard when you never ever understand what i'm actually posting  

it depends on the meaning you give to “being real”

Quote:




Being a Troll =/= not being "real" (as you put it)

That person that is trolling might not be an accurate representation of the person doing the posting, however the question of being "least real" was meant to be taken as "less believable" as a character on the internet.

I guess though i did not make it clear in this thread that the second part of the question from the original thread was  "...and most likely to be part of drew's imagination?" which was the first post of the thread. If you think that out of the people i listed, and lets say one of them is a fake account by drew, which one would it most likely be, I doubt MVT would be part of drews imagination, but Harvey is much more plausible.

Utter wrote on 11/21/11 at 10:59:47:


Wrong. Someone will say something they don't mean or find true to erupt emotions from those they are targeting. This is called "acting," as in...not being your true self. What's the opposite of true? Fake.

I'll make it clear for all.

My TRUE thoughts is that women who claim a celebrity male is hot is NOT a whore based on this statement alone.

But I have trolled YouTube females (at least this is the gender they are attempting to project) by calling them whores for commenting about how much they find a celebrity attractive.

I am trolling, but at the same time; I am also not being my "true" self.

So, to say trolling is being your true self is a 100% false statement because it only takes one contradiction to turn a statement into a false one.

I'm done with this thread, because I know I'll have to type way more since I'll have 20-so users quoting and attempting to disrupt the river of truth that I allow to flow through my posts.  

An entire conversation of semantics. This could get interesting.

Also, how do you know that people who voted for MVT might have voted correctly, that they feel he isn't real?

Low            

RUSE wrote on 11/21/11 at 10:04:18:


Quite frankly, I never pointed that out kiddo.  Run off to another forum noobster.  I don't troll either, so get your facts straight.

Yeah... MVT doesnt troll... He just tells the truth

TellTale wrote on 11/21/11 at 14:11:58:

They've always been epic. But I do not know why you think they are epic now, compared to not epic before.