By anonymous, I meant like:

3 attempts to shoot MVT

instead of

Camster, Zwiebel, and MVT attempted to shoot MVT

Fant0m wrote on 10/04/11 at 01:18:45:
I....give up

Fant0m wrote on 10/04/11 at 11:55:00:

Mihawk wrote on 10/01/11 at 03:00:11:

As already pointed out, if someone is winning, that doesn't make it easy for everyone else to take them out. The winning person doesn't know if they are only being targeted by one person (if they self-shoot and no one targets them, they die), and everyone else won't know if the winning person is self-shooting (if he does self-shoot, anyone targeting him will die).

This is why it's important that who did what is anonymous (shot counts shouldn't be anonymous though), because if someone self-shoots and gains the advantage, everyone else would know that the person can't self-shoot again and he won't be able to prevent the next obvious move.

Also, as already posted in the OP, people can lead you on during the game should they act like they're agreeing to coordinate. Just like Mafia, people can say whatever they want, but can also do whatever they want. So it makes for an interesting mind game.

Camster wrote on 10/04/11 at 13:06:43:

the bold part: This is a very good thing... except if someone posts, saying to everyone else not to shoot that person, because he is going to...

the non bold part: And that's exactly what I dislike about the game organised ftm! That's not fair for the person winning!
I mean, if noone kills him, that's good for him. He's lucky.

I have an alternative simpler...
I think it won't really matter if and only if, the moment when one player decides to shoot himself is not told.
The host can tell everything anonymously appart from the fact that this or that guy shoots himself.
So that the other players won't be sure that someone can really be killed or not... because they won't know if this player still has the power to shoot himself or not.

Otherwise the game will be useless and, once again, unfair.

Edit: or AT LEAST, write for example "someone shot himself" and not "MVT shot himself" for example.

padz wrote on 10/04/11 at 14:43:52:

Wait wat? Have you at least read the rules?
You can't shoot twice the same person!

.....

To answer everyones Qs

Postponement- Probably No, Ive been editing the rules in OP AS i go... I think every one has had sufficient notice...

Anomynous shots- hmmm... there are many ways we can do this... The thing in Q is HOW to do self shots. This is how i think it should be done

in one paragraph have a summary of how many people shot at who
example 5 shot at MVT

And in another paragraph have which shots were killing shots
say A shot b who Shot self And A was shot by C...
It would be
A's Shot was unsuccessful
B's shot was unsuccessful
C's shot was successful
(B's Self shot was unsuccessful cause he didnt lose a life cause A shot at him

And A lives sumnmary at the end
example
[5] C
[5] B
[3] A (-2)

Im going to add a poll... because even if shots are revealed... it would still make for some interesting stratergy (... unless we had all flos playing )

Where are the "cancel the game" and "IRC only" options?

TellTale wrote on 10/04/11 at 15:14:16:

well... if its irc exclusive... half the board dont come to irc so it would be unfair for them to missout...
Also Im a finisher. The game is NOT being cancelled

TellTale wrote on 10/04/11 at 15:25:14:


well when 9/10 times the topic is based on sex... why would they go there (well... from experience every time im there... 9/10)

TellTale wrote on 10/04/11 at 15:32:59:

Take your trolls elsewhere.  They are silly, senseless, thrown together out of thin air, and dont work.

MVT, i know your sig speaks for itself, but seriously? shut the fuck up.  if you dont wanna play, then dont play, and quit bitchin about it.

KoopZ wrote on 10/04/11 at 16:10:13:


I don't need to take your shit either.  Fank refused to address any of my legitimate complains and inquiries even when I asked them in a nice manner.  Thus my replies turned in a different direction after he directly insulted me.

Im not here to argue MVT...
Sign up or GTHO