David Wonn wrote on 05/17/10 at 11:23:23:IsThatAGoodTime wrote on 05/17/10 at 07:25:38:To you and all the others worried about their kart games getting included, we're only counting the MAIN games you're in, the part of the community you are most a part of.
Am I not included in SMK since the vast majority of my time trialing in that game was done in 1995 - 1997? Or is a former #1 at NTSC not good enough? :-) I wouldn't be an MK64 player if it weren't for SMK, and I consider my contributions to both games as being equally important, even if it's been a decade since my last SMK WR.
The intention is to put you in your appropriate voting sphere. Sure, you played SMK in 1995-1997, but do you really identify with today's SMK players? Have a hard time believing you do, as you haven't posted there in the last 2 years or so. Basically all these are for is to be able to say "Sami won most of the SMK crowd, the tally being 20-4, but Fried took MK64 by a slim margin 19-18." at the end of each match. They're not to show who's good at what games or how much you contributed to them, it's more of a gauge of where each player belongs in the community. In other words, these categories are based on social characteristics, not competition-related achievements. Originally we were going to give each person only one category, but a handful of people really are a big part of more than 1 Kart game's community. However, to make everyone feel included, everyone gets at least one game on their list, even if they haven't been around since 2003 or never post/play it, or something.
Do you feel like you identify more with Dave Smith, April, Joe Bernier, Guillaume Leviach, and Florent Lecoanet; or Kevin Booth, Finn Berger, Cooper Lovera, Myles Bukrim, Nathan Stinson, and Pier-Yves Lemire? Just judging by who you've participated at meets with, I'd lean toward the second group of names which is why you're listed as Kart 64.
Flo: No.