TASPlasma wrote on 11/11/15 at 17:31:40:1. What's fine to do: Post a lap 1, call it prelim, then post a 3 lap of the same course, where the lap 1 time has been improved by some amount (obviously more than .001, unless a different shroom strat was used etc).
2. It's also ok to post a prelim lap 1 that you never end up improving, as long as this prelim lap 1 has new strats (but it's maybe a better idea to just post a video of the new strategy, and mention how much time it saves).
3. It's also alright, to post a whole 3 lap, call it prelim, and then later redo the run, improving it by some amount of time (a better idea would be just not finish a run if it had a sloppy lap 1, redo the lap 1 immediately, then proceed to the next laps).
4. What is frowned upon in the MKW TAS community, is making a sloppy 3lap run, calling it prelim, then never redoing it.
At least, this what I think the general agreement is with the MKW TAS community.
Thanks, I understand now.

Up until this post, I've seen lots of hate for "shit" TAS runs without a real reason, other than people thinking it was bad. Giving advice is something that I've seen and a good way to talk about it, but just shitting all over someone's TAS without backing it up needs to stop, imo.