padz wrote on 05/24/09 at 12:19:03:Matt, your arguments so far have been either weak as all hell or have just been repeats of what Honko and Etch have said.
Kinda hard to make something new out of what's already been said. I would have said the same thing regardless, but that's not exactly easy when I have a limit on my internet that turns it off about an hour when I get back from work, now is it?
padz wrote on 05/24/09 at 12:19:03:Actually it's identical to his style from last game. He's trying to bait mafia and you fell for it. And otherwise you pretty much said exactly what Etch did.
I'm town, so his mafia bait isn't working that well. I already explained why I haven't said anything new. Everything that needs to be said, has been said. I did however bring up Honko, so I'm at least contributing my opinion.
padz wrote on 05/24/09 at 12:19:03:karterfreak wrote on 05/24/09 at 10:40:49:I myself don't have a reason to vote for flo, other than the grudge I've got against him for making me look like an idiot in the mafia game where I defended him, and he was mafia.
You were mafia too, you knew exactly what you were getting into. Defending him was a retarded move
Don't pretend that you're a victim for making a stupid decision last game. You say it as if you weren't mafia; wouldn't it have been smarter to just say that being mafia last game was irrelevant?
I think you're mixing up two completely different games. I was the cop in the game I defended flo, I was mafia in the game where I defended Howes (which put me in a bad place for how badly I defended him). Either way, if you bothered to read last game, you would have known that I would have defended Howes even if I was town, for the same reason I defended flo when I was cop, it seemed like too stupid of a move for a mafia to make.
padz wrote on 05/24/09 at 12:19:03:Really? 'Saying something suspicious' is your best argument? At least try to come up with something that sounds reasonable. They are the three easiest people to jump on right now given that half of us want Math gone and the other two are under the spotlight.
Honko is suspicious for reasons Etch already said, there's no point in me rephrasing it in another way, because Etch already made his point valid. Jabes is suspicious for the exact reason Darius posted a couple posts ago. Yet again, I won't rephrase it because Darius already made the point quite clear. Math, like everyone has pointed out, hasn't contributed anything except for a oneliner insult. Why wouldn't I be suspicious of him? Nobody else is even remotely suspicious, so there's no point calling them out until they've done something suspicious.
padz wrote on 05/24/09 at 12:19:03:You've been on the defensive so far, just like last game and opposite to your style as town. This got you lynched last game. If you want to stay around I'd advise that you try to make some observations for yourself and not just try to squeak by copying other peoples' arguments.
The reason that I wasn't defensive in the games that I was town was because I wasn't being accused of anything, and I had more time on my hands, so I had more time to think out my posts.
padz wrote on 05/24/09 at 12:19:03:karterfreak wrote on 05/24/09 at 10:40:49:I'm not going to vote right now until I've come up with who I find more suspicious.
Sounds pretty much exactly like what you said around this point last game huh! Seems like you've already made up your mind on who you want gone and are just waiting to see whichever vote would go over better with town.
Or, you know, I might just not know who I consider more suspicious at this time. Hell, if I voted for math, you'd be jumping on me for that too, so its not like it makes a difference whether I vote or not.
I have to go to work now, I'll be back around 8:40PM EST
Pages: 
