Michael F
|
The scores were real, just not his. If we are going to call the records here world records then it should be acceptable to submit other people's times for the record list.
As I said, it's impossible to 100% guarantee anything, we just do the best we can. People aren't supposed to lie about identity. If you submit other people's WRs as your own then you'd probably get caught because people would probably recognize the vids.
There's no hard proof for either argument. For all we know the Japanese site may be larger than this one. No community should declare superiority over another.
Why not claim that one site is more official? The players' page has the characteristics of an official site more than the Japanese site. And just being large alone doesn't make a site official. If I start a new site today and I tell 2000 people in my school to submit times of 1:12 for F8C, does that make it make it more official than the players' page?
No vids, but pics and strats. Sounds very credibible, even without the vids.
Can you post a link to some strats he's typed up?
Yes, so why not complete the clarification by changing it to site records and not world records? Why are you letting your irrational conservatism prevent such a simple change? What harm could it possibly cause?
Are you just gonna keep on repeating the same thing hoping that I'll get bored and you'll win by default? For the 23rd time, same reason Guiness doesn't change it to "book record". It just sounds silly and it's pointless.
The MK world isn't contained in this little bubble you call the most official site. Not only are there a decent amount of people here who support my argument, but tons from large communities such as GameFAQs, Nintendo (yes, I'm aware most there are imbeciles), cyberscore, the SSBM community, and various other places.
Alright, change "3" to "tons". Either way it's not a popular majority so my point still stands.
|