Right, its not easier. Mts are harder on 50hz. probably he is in need of such blind excuses.

Look at him...than u will know about jumping jack´s.

Mts aren't harder on 50hz. you just have to find the rythm. then it's the same.

I agree with you paul. Updates are really interesting right now.

Paul R   wrote on 08/08/04 at 11:37:05:


ok than its the same und nobody can say its harder to use 60hz. i havent led this discussion before. moritz always alleges such untruth. perhaps he only has complexes.

Blue_Dash   wrote on 08/08/04 at 11:45:06:


i  played both mode intensively and there aren't any differences. you just need a little time to accustom that's all.

Paul R   wrote on 08/08/04 at 11:48:19:


played!  

I do agree. Thats the reason for my trouble about moritz teasing against the 50hz user. he bothers the complete board with remarks like '50hz sucks' etc. why he doesnt suspend??

You 50Hz players are still VERY talented though   (the ones up the higher end of the leaderboard)

i won't tell anything about 50/60 mode.... (same opinion as PaulR and Bluedash)... just to say congrats Moritz... and sure i would prefer his times updates when they are done.. koz as it is said i take a look on what track i should do to improve my stat... and now i have too many tracks to improve if i want to take my 1st place back  .. and i will....

i meant it's cool to have an update every sunday.

Ok, I played 50hz before and then i chaged to 60Hz, and I dont deny that it is harder in 60hz, at first it was alot ahrd, but after a few weeks of practicing i got used to the speed difference. I dont think the level that the person plays at changes, in 50Hz I looked at my best splits for certain tracks, and then in 60Hz after a few weeks of adjusting i looked at the splits i could get and they were abotu the same, On some tracks i.e. MB my splits got even better. I don't think this means anything really. From this you cnat say that becasue i played 60hz i got the MB pr if i carried on playing in 50Hz i would have proably got the same standard WR. The thing is that people think that 60Hz is so much harder but from what I've seen and also my pr's on Mb and other tracks also shows that is not much of a differecne at all. Since changing to 60 I dont find that I pr less or more. I dont find I have to play for longer to pr on a track, after a while of adjsuting any 50 player should be able to easily accustom to 60hz and carrying on play at the same level they used to. (smiley for the hell of it)

I agree Mark I always try to post PRs the same day, but sometimes can't when my brothers or parents are hogging the computer

And I would like updates to stay the way they are now, once or twice per day

I like the frequent updates, especially when I submit new times.

Moritz   wrote on 08/10/04 at 02:16:48:


Ok firstly I used to play 60Hz way before like when i first started, then I changed to 50hz for proof and I can say honestly it was just as fucking hard to change, I used to turn to damn early becasue of the slowness, I missed so many mt's and it took me the same amount of time(2 weeks or so) to get used to 50hz changing from 60hz. Moritz I understand where you are coming from but you have not played both so I think it is fair to say your opinion can't really be counted. You have to experiecne both modes and you will see that it is not easy either to change form 60 to 50. Obviously changing fomr one to the other is not the same difficulty but they are very close.

Also 1:16:300 on LC well no I haven't hit it but I have bettered my 1 shroom lap, it is now 25:095 and also my 0 shroom lap 1st lap I haven't beaten my old splits of 25:897 but I have gotten 25:950 or so a number of times. I think the fastest I've got on LC since my change is about 1:16:590 or so, but I haven't played that track much.