|
Mario Kart MB
https://www.mariokart64.com/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl Mario Kart >> Mario Kart 7 >> Best possible times thread; are these subs doable? https://www.mariokart64.com/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1533238392 Message started by Nick Renzetti on 08/02/18 at 11:33:12 |
|
Title: Best possible times thread; are these subs doable? Post by Nick Renzetti on 08/02/18 at 11:33:12 Thought I’d post this since MK7 is now at the point where the best possible strategies are being optimized for at least most of the tracks, and the only thing left is to have as much finesse as possible and tighten the runs. So I’ll list subs here where the best known splits don’t quite make the sub, but are really close; TC sub-1:19 MC sub-1:57 RRM sub-1:58 WS sub-1:53 rKTB sub-1:30 rKD sub-1:34 MW G sub-1:04 RIW sub-1:50 rDC G sub-1:10 I bolded the tracks where the BKS now make the sub. Curious to hear any thoughts on whether or not these are possible and if you guys think they’ll be done sometime in the future |
|
Title: Re: Best possible times thread Post by Martijn Veldhuis on 08/02/18 at 11:39:06 7F5852595E5D504263545F310 wrote:
100% sure everything except MC, rKTB, WL G and rBC1 G, RIW and rDC G will never happen. |
|
Title: Re: Best possible times thread; are these subs doa Post by Nick Renzetti on 08/02/18 at 14:08:07 I wouldn’t count out TC reaching 1:18.9xx so fast, after all it’s less than .1 away from the current BKS.. 2 top players get into a WR battle and it could happen |
|
Title: Re: Best possible times thread; are these subs doa Post by Kleenex on 08/02/18 at 15:41:11 What about 1:54 on DKJ NG? Ray believes that it could be achieved, it's even our GOD standard [smiley=smokin.gif] |
|
Title: Re: Best possible times thread; are these subs doa Post by Nick Renzetti on 08/02/18 at 15:54:38 0F2821212A213C440 wrote:
I left it out because I also recall Ray saying it was possible [smiley=thumbsup.gif] |
|
Title: Re: Best possible times thread; are these subs doa Post by Kleenex on 08/02/18 at 16:17:07 4562686364676A78596E650B0 wrote:
I left it out because I also recall Ray saying it was possible [smiley=thumbsup.gif][/quote] Oh, ok [smiley=thumbsup.gif] |
|
Title: Re: Best possible times thread; are these subs doa Post by Martijn Veldhuis on 08/03/18 at 00:23:11 5C7B717A7D7E736140777C120 wrote:
I don't think so If you see how strong the top 100 of that track is. The BKS'es must be near to be maxed. 1:19.1 could happen. But I don't think lower is humanly unless a new strat will be found. |
|
Title: Re: Best possible times thread; are these subs doa Post by Nick Renzetti on 08/05/18 at 14:17:23 Went back and watched Thomas’ former WR on TC (1:19.238) with slick tires, and noticed he missed the SMT on the last turn in lap 1, what do you suppose he could’ve gotten without that mistake? At least 1:19.100 or perhaps even lower, I think. But whatever he would’ve gotten, it certainly would be near unbeatable |
|
Title: Re: Best possible times thread; are these subs doa Post by BMence on 08/06/18 at 02:06:13 Would have been like 1:19.170 or 1:19.160, not 1:19.100 or below at all. |
|
Title: Re: Best possible times thread; are these subs doa Post by cros107 on 08/07/18 at 17:21:01 I'm pretty sure optimal SSMTs with RMs only save like .05, probably less for slicks. |
|
Title: Re: Best possible times thread; are these subs doa Post by Nick Renzetti on 08/08/18 at 11:26:40 .05 over 3 laps is .15, that would be a big improvement for TC |
|
Title: Re: Best possible times thread; are these subs doa Post by Martijn Veldhuis on 08/26/18 at 05:16:03 0F2821212A213C440 wrote:
Definitely within reach now. And 9-1-0 is even possible while it probably isn't done in BKS. But Thomas doesn't like to play the track... He refuses to keep going. |
|
Title: Re: Best possible times thread; are these subs doa Post by Noah R. on 08/27/18 at 18:57:56 9-1-0 is 40 times harder than anything else on the track. |
|
Title: Re: Best possible times thread; are these subs doa Post by Nick Renzetti on 08/28/18 at 11:47:02 Now we know rDC G sub-1:10 is possible since best splits add up to 1:09.9xx, and if Roa had gotten a great L3 in his recent fail he could’ve done it, though I think 1:10.0 or 1:10.1 would’ve been more likely |
|
Title: Re: Best possible times thread; are these subs doa Post by Nick Renzetti on 09/01/18 at 19:16:31 I’m going to add one more possible (or impossible) sub to discuss: rLR sub-1:42.75 Doing this would be cutting exactly .1 off the current WR, and it’s .028 lower than the BKS. |
|
Title: Re: Best possible times thread; are these subs doa Post by Martijn Veldhuis on 09/01/18 at 21:45:42 6542484344474A58794E452B0 wrote:
I can't say if that will be ever reached. But there are still some strategies found on rLR which WR isn't using and could be possibly faster. But it might not. |
|
Title: Re: Best possible times thread; are these subs doa Post by Nick Renzetti on 09/02/18 at 15:07:42 684457514C4F4B684E12250 wrote:
I can't say if that will be ever reached. But there are still some strategies found on rLR which WR isn't using and could be possibly faster. But it might not.[/quote] I didn’t know that, what are the other strategies? |
|
Title: Re: Best possible times thread; are these subs doa Post by Martijn Veldhuis on 09/02/18 at 21:49:18 2D0A000B0C0F021031060D630 wrote:
I can't say if that will be ever reached. But there are still some strategies found on rLR which WR isn't using and could be possibly faster. But it might not.[/quote] I didn’t know that, what are the other strategies?[/quote] What I remember is that there's a way to get 2 SMT's in the tunnel and a ssmt before the entrance of the tunnel. |
|
Title: Re: Best possible times thread; are these subs doa Post by SilverMK on 09/20/18 at 03:13:44 Oof WL G got shattered |
|
Title: Re: Best possible times thread; are these subs doa Post by Martijn Veldhuis on 09/20/18 at 04:25:18 4B69726F696861676B6F6861060 wrote:
And how. OMG |
|
Title: Re: Best possible times thread; are these subs doa Post by Nick Renzetti on 09/25/18 at 07:51:39 Seeing that the rBC1 G BKS now add up to 1:10.129, it makes me think even more that 1:09 could be done with this strat. Only a few months ago, the BKS equaled 1:10.4xx and I doubt anyone thought 1:10.1 or even 1:10.2 was possible but now we know it is. The record’s been pushed down a lot this past couple months and I think it still has a long way to go before it’s maxed out |
|
Title: Re: Best possible times thread; are these subs doa Post by Martijn Veldhuis on 11/30/18 at 14:20:08 13343E3532313C2E0F38335D0 wrote:
Maybe 1:09 in no time |
|
Title: Re: Best possible times thread; are these subs doa Post by Martijn Veldhuis on 12/16/18 at 06:15:58 TC sub maybe possible. 1:45 MP reached and 1:40 NBC incoming. |
|
Title: Re: Best possible times thread; are these subs doa Post by Martijn Veldhuis on 12/28/18 at 01:31:03 rMT is destroyed NG? 2:13 incoming? G 1:46/45 incoming? |
|
Title: Re: Best possible times thread; are these subs doa Post by Nick Renzetti on 01/21/19 at 01:19:27 Is that TC sub still impossible Martijn? BKS now 1:18.993 ;) |
|
Title: Re: Best possible times thread; are these subs doa Post by Martijn Veldhuis on 01/21/19 at 01:52:30 5D7A707B7C7F726041767D130 wrote:
Not anymore ;) Also, Nova even got a 27.294 on L1. So bks might give even lower as that. |
|
Title: Re: Best possible times thread; are these subs doa Post by Martijn Veldhuis on 01/27/19 at 06:05:39 What about 1:51 DKJ G? You know we could do the cut shroomless where they used a shroom for in the current WR? What about using 2 shrooms for glidercut L1? (1 at the gliderpanel and 1 at the landing.) And the last one where the current WR does it. But then not using it for the jump. But before the blue panel after the jump? And ofc 2 shroomless glitches. |
|
Mario Kart MB » Powered by YaBB 2.2! YaBB © 2000-2007. All Rights Reserved. |